<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would You Work for a Transnational?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myglobalcareer.com/2009/11/16/would-you-work-for-a-transnational/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myglobalcareer.com/2009/11/16/would-you-work-for-a-transnational/</link>
	<description>Advancing your career in the global economy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:06:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.myglobalcareer.com/2009/11/16/would-you-work-for-a-transnational/comment-page-1/#comment-4434</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myglobalcareer.com/archives/2008/01/22/would-you-work-for-a-transnational/#comment-4434</guid>
		<description>These days, CEOs run their companies like chess-players.  Their employees are the pieces and pawns that the CEO is quite prepared to sacrifice for a higher objective.

The problem is that most of these press articles are written from the viewpoint of the chess-player, whereas the vast majority of us work as pawns.  Through no fault of their own, the employees&#039; job can be sacrificed because, for example, labour costs are cheaper in another country halfway round the world.

If you&#039;re going to work for a company like that, do so for a couple of years, but don&#039;t develop any loyalty or dependency on the company.

There are plenty of other types of employer -- small ones, innovative ones, public sector organisations etc -- which offer either short-term excitement and remuneration or long-term stability.  Transnationals can end up offering neither, and the CEOs will eventually learn to their cost that they are not getting the best out of their employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, CEOs run their companies like chess-players.  Their employees are the pieces and pawns that the CEO is quite prepared to sacrifice for a higher objective.</p>
<p>The problem is that most of these press articles are written from the viewpoint of the chess-player, whereas the vast majority of us work as pawns.  Through no fault of their own, the employees&#8217; job can be sacrificed because, for example, labour costs are cheaper in another country halfway round the world.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to work for a company like that, do so for a couple of years, but don&#8217;t develop any loyalty or dependency on the company.</p>
<p>There are plenty of other types of employer &#8212; small ones, innovative ones, public sector organisations etc &#8212; which offer either short-term excitement and remuneration or long-term stability.  Transnationals can end up offering neither, and the CEOs will eventually learn to their cost that they are not getting the best out of their employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

