Quantcast

Archive for the 'Salary' Category

How Will You Spend Your 3 Percent Raise?

Published Aug 06 2008 Updated Aug 05 2008

The dog days of summer are upon us - west coast skies are smoky and the east coast is humid and stormy. The economy is tanking, but if you stretch the concept of good news, employers are coming to the rescue with talk of small pay raises next year.

On the whole, I wouldn’t spend that expected 3.5 percent pay hike in Bermuda or Hawaii. Suffice to say, that merit pay increase isn’t keeping up with price of milk and sugar, much less gas.

Watson Wyatt Worldwide, a global HR consulting firm, surveyed 1,389 employers globally, including 276 in the U.S., said that employees who exceed expectations may expect to receive between 4.2 percent to 6 percent merit pay increases, so maybe that’s an incentive for you to work harder this year.

Laura Sejen, global director of strategic rewards consulting at Watson Wyatt, claims that “Employees will view holding merit increase budgets steady as a positive sign that will help them offset inflation and higher energy and food costs.” I beg to differ.

IT Salaries Rising Amid New Opportunities

Published Jul 09 2007 Updated Jul 09 2007

Unless you’re an HR compensation wonk, you may be unaware that most published salary studies utilize data provided by corporate sponsors. The data in employer-based studies is solid, but there’s always something missing. That missing ingredient is the employee’s perspective about their satisfaction with their employer, and their commitment to their career.

That’s precisely the kind of data woven into the DNA of InformationWeek’s 2007 National IT Salary Survey, which is based upon survey results from 7,281 full-time IT professionals.

As my former colleague Chris Murphy reports in a recent issue, “Previously, base salaries were in lockdown mode. In 2004, 2005, and 2006, the median base for staff and managers moved about 1 percent a year–a net decrease considering inflation. This year, the median base pay is up 6.6 percent for managers and 5.7 percent for staffers, well above inflation.”

The study finds that the typical IT manager makes $105,000 in salary and cash bonuses, while the average staffer earns $78,000.

One of the things I like about the study is it asks employees to agree or disagree with psychographic statements such as “I’m highly valued as a business technology professional, and I’m put in a position where I can share my deep experience with colleagues.” Interestingly, only 40 percent of staffers agree with this statement compared to 54 percent of managers.

Among the IT staff and managers currently looking for a new job, more than two-thirds are interested in earning more money. No surprise there. Two in five IT professionals dislike their present employer’s management & culture, which is a fairly high percentage, except when you consider the turmoil this field has experienced the past five or six years.

In a separate item, Marilyn K. McGee points out in The IT Battle of the Sexes, that women in IT who earn .85 cents for every dollar made by their male counterparts, actually have it better than many women in other careers. You have to wonder why women don’t stage a walkout over unfair and unequal compensation policies, but that doesn’t appear to be on anyone’s front burner.

The Sam Palmisano Question

Published Mar 13 2007 Updated Mar 13 2007

Reading Sam Palmisano’s official IBM biography, it’s difficult to tell why he’s working. As chairman and CEO of the world’s largest tech services company, he is both well-regarded and scandal-free. And IBM is doing relatively well, so it’s not like he should be embarrassed to show up at the office. It’s just that if we were to, say, resign, he would walk away with, according to today’s WSJ, more money than he could stuff under a mattress factory.

Palmisano, who reportedly earned $24.5 million last year, “could be in line for greater rewards if the computer giant meets performance targets over the coming years,” says the Journal. But then again, why bother? He is eligible to take home $4.5 million a year for life in pension. Is there a point at which his executive compensation package becomes just a little bit demotivating?

So, let’s put ourselves in Sam’s loafers: if you stay at IBM in 2007 you will earn a hefty $25 million. But if you leave to go enjoy that money, your pension pay is at least $4.5 million annually for life, plus you can earn hefty speaking fees. Which would you choose?

If you're Sam Palmisano, do you stay or retire?

  recent posts
Recent Posts
  • Career Resources

    Check out our first list of useful blogs, career tools and social media sites for job seekers and global careerists. With your suggestions, we will add many more resources.
  • Global Virtual Management

    Want to become an expert at "virtual" business management? Check out our free, self-guided Career Primer by Colleen Garton, author of Managing Without Walls.
  • LET’S STAY IN TOUCH

    Want to sign up for our contact list? Choices include: newsletter, job seekers and career advice. We respect your privacy.

Skype
Close
E-mail It